.

Most say that the “multiverse” concept

is a theory without a shred of real evidence.

.

What then could scientists say

who desperately want everyone to take it seriously?

.

Here’s a peak a one argument.

 

For more use the DOOR.

.

   [MORE]

.

   Paste this in your browser:

https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/claim-no-fine-tuning-needed-an-alternative-universe-without-a-weak-force-could-work/

.

   Here’s a couple of paragraphs from the reasoning and reaction to it (coloring and boldface is ours):

Claim: No fine-tuning needed; an alternative universe without a weak force could work February 3, 2018 Posted by News under Fine tuning, Intelligent Design, Multiverse, Physics

…..

“What’s becoming obvious is that the multiverse does not need to be real because evidence does not matter nearly as much as it used to. Once the multiversers have won the war against falsifiability and other decision-making tools in science, they can simply assume that the multiverse exists, period.

Those who claim that there is no evidence for a multiverse will be considered anti-science, not because there is in fact evidence but because evidence is no longer needed. That’s the power of post-modern science.”

.

   This is just a snippet out of something much larger. If you’re interested in multiverse and refusing to consider “no evidence” a handicap, you need to go to the article itself.